“Open Letter”
c. 2013 Rod Ice
All rights reserved
(8-13)
For this writer, an
occasional detour into the realm of political humor has generally yielded
interesting prose. In particular, I have written a few times about fictional
meetings between Carrie Hamglaze, an imaginary local figure of renown, and
Reince Priebus, Chairman of her beloved Republican National Committee.
Recently, a friend on the
social networking website “Facebook” posted a report about Mr. Priebus being upset
with an apparent bias in favor of Hillary Clinton at CNN and NBC. The person
sharing this link observed that he was acting like Russian strongman Vladimir
Putin.
I was struck by his
comment more than the story itself.
Pondering this post, as
the night deepened in hue, I began to think about actually writing Chairman
Priebus. The idea seemed surreal.
Days elapsed in careful
consideration. Yet my desire to speak only grew stronger. Eventually, I sat
down at my desk and began to work:
Reince Priebus, Chairman
The Republican National Committee
310 First Street
SE Washington, DC 20003
Dear Mr. Priebus,
I am a small-town newspaper columnist from
northeastern Ohio. Let me confess here, for the sake of full disclosure, that I
am a registered member of the Libertarian Party.
Recently, I read a report about your plan to boycott
CNN and NBC, with regard to the 2016 presidential primary debates. This was
attributed to your unhappiness over potential documentary programs about
erstwhile First Lady, Senator and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. A
follow-up story indicated that you were considering a panel of debate
moderators like radio heavyweight Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity from Fox News.
While your plan has been predictably been cheered by
the conservative blogosphere and Fox News itself, may I respectfully offer the
opinion that such actions only serve to promote the idea that your party is out
of touch with everyday Americans.
To use an old description, you are “preaching to the
choir.”
Winning national elections requires more than simply
rallying a small, tightly-knit group of influential volunteers within the
party. It means that one must speak clearly and effectively to diverse groups
across the country, with a common message.
Honestly, it can be convincingly argued that the mainstream
media is not friendly to conservative candidates in general. Yet to hear
protestations of the kind you have voiced is unseemly for someone of national
renown. Even those who view the GOP favorably might well conclude that you are
thin-skinned and cranky after hearing the threat of action against these major news
networks. I do believe that the right to engage in political opposition, as
Hillary herself once observed during the Bush administration, is a sacred
American tradition.
But I do not believe that media bias, or political
dissent, caused your group to take a drubbing in 2012. Instead, it was because
potential candidates like Condolezza Rice, Susana Martinez, Nikki Haley, Bobby
Jindal and Marco Rubio were all sitting on the sidelines, while Mitt Romney ran
like Forrest Gump toward his moment of epic failure.
The general opinion of Republican logic is that your
thought processes are consistent with a doddering herd of rich, old, white
men. In 2012, you did absolutely nothing
to dispel such thoughts. This seems a bit tragic, with so many compelling
figures not participating in the contest.
Even wireless talkers like Michael Savage observed
that your propensity toward blandness was astounding. He likened adding Rep.
Paul Ryan to the ticket with Governor Romney as being like combining “Wonder
Bread and white rice.”
True believers in the party were excited by this
combination. But the election returns demonstrated convincingly that few other
people shared their enthusiasm.
Imagine: Condi Rice debating President Obama in 2012.
Post-election, I might be writing this letter from a completely different
perspective.
Imagine: Blunting Democrat charges of “racism” on the
issue of illegal immigration by proposing a completely new US strategy –
placing importance on the security, stability and liberty of Mexico, our
geographical neighbor, instead of distant nations like Iraq and Afghanistan. Again,
this note might be resounding with a completely different tone.
Imagine: An end-around on the healthcare reform debate
by offering many working-class citizens better access to coverage and control
of their plans, through small business networking, thus lowering the cost?
Imagine: Responding to charges of voter suppression by
advocating voter education and greater citizen participation at every level? By
proclaiming a sense of “duty” long lost in much of the nation?
“The Party of Lincoln.” It is a label your members are
fond of using. Consider that the one word most appropriate for Abe’s entire
presidency might well be “courage.” Consider also that the GOP of 2012 could be
described with a single word. But one less flattering in character - “predictable.”
With hindsight, one might imagine that the GOP plan
for 2016 would involve sober self-assessment and new-age thinking. But instead,
you are making headlines for a familiar reason. Sour grapes over the media. This
seems particularly puzzling because the media itself is in a state of
transition. Social networks, video streaming and news aggregation sites have redefined
the world of dispersing useful information. There has never been a better time
for conservatives than today. Many alternatives exist to the polished parade of
network television reporters.
Your party is strong here in Geauga County and across much
of Ohio. But going forward, one might react with befuddlement at your inability
to use your own toolkit to repair the damage of losing two presidential
contests in a row.
A simple question awaits your answer: Is the party
ready to focus on a 21st Century vision, or merely the shrill,
cartoonish squawking of cable-news pundits?
A point to ponder when you have finished preaching to
the GOP choir.
Yours Respectfully, RDI
Comments about Thoughts At Large may be sent to:
icewritesforyou@gmail.com
Visit us at: www.thoughtsatlarge.com
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home